Jewish Hubris
Thanks, Danny, for bringing this article to my attention. The American Enterprise Institute, a conservative “think†tank in Washington, D.C., held a conference yesterday to laud us Jews for being more intelligent than the rest of you. Dana Milbank’s description of the event did not mention whether or not the AEI panel  (Entine, the author of a book on the subject, Murray, another AEI guy, and Zoloth, who was invited to challenge the other two) addressed the veracity of any other claims about Jews’ genetic predispositions. Now that we have the good news, we may want to determine if Tay-Sachs disease and intelligence are also accompanied by genetic mutations for hubris, bad judgment – a possibility raised by Milbank while reminiscing about the extraordinary decision-making capabilities of Paul Wolfowitz, another AEI fellow, during his time in office – or greed.Â
Although I have about as much science on my side as these guys probably do, my theory is that Jews’ seemingly “higher†intelligence level stems from our deficiency of athletic ability. Evidence for our less-than-average athleticism can be found in my bad lower back, knees, heels, and my shaky right hand.  In order to survive the thousands of years of persecution, people like me were compelled to be creative because our non-aerodynamic facial features and poor foot speed rendered us sitting ducks.Â
But these theories of Jewish intelligence raise one question that our abnormally intelligent friends at AEI probably have not considered: if Jews are so smart, why are there so few of them? Wouldn’t smart people multiply and seek to protect themselves by winning the numbers game?Â
If I had to imagine the panelists’ answers (not Zoloth), they would probably bicker over who is to blame more for the paucity of people who claim allegiance to the Jewish faith: the Christians or Muslims. Yet, there is probably another reason for the lack of Jews; people like these guys at AEI.Â
In a roomful of Christians, I feel like a Jew. In a roomful of Jews, I tend to feel even more ostracized. Indeed, it’s the hubris of people such as Wolfowitz, Entine, and Murray that fuel my sense of isolation; the same hubris that causes Israel to avoid peace with the Palestinians (regardless of the Palestinians’ own efforts to avoid peace). This hubris can also be found in the temple to which my family belongs, where, in the wake of the most recent destruction of Lebanon, we were handed contact information - with our prayer books - for foundations that support wounded and killed Israeli soldiers. There was no piece of paper for the thousands of injured and killed Lebanese. Nor was there a paper for the 1.4 million Israelis living in poverty.Â
For people like Wolfowitz, Entine, and Murray, their hubris eats away at their intelligence like a cancer, rendering their ideas want of judgment. In short, they are ignorant. Fortunately, not all Jews suffer from this disease. And, as it turns out, people of other faiths are not immune to it either; neither Bush nor Cheney are Jewish, thank god.
Jon Entine on 30 Oct 2007 at 6:10 pm #
Hi Andrew,
Frankly, for someone with your often nuanced view of the world, I am surprised at the condescending tone of your post.
Obviously you are not familiar with the American Enterprise Institute. I know it’s easy and saves stress on brain cells to put people in ideological boxes as a way not to have to think challengingly abut issues. But AEI has in its ranks some of the top public policy scholars from across the ideological spectrum on any number of issues. Every scholar is independent. No one checks what we write.
I for one was recruited to the AEI as a part-time fellow after I wrote an article, co-authored with a current AEI scholar (and the moderator of Monday’s talk) Sally Satel, in the Washington Post blasting the Bush Administration for its genetically/scientifically ignorant and (unintentionally) racist stem cell policy. The board at AEI wanted someone to be able to address genetic issues, and I was one person who had a growing expertise in that area (and a prior book, “Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We’re Afraid to Talk About It,” that was widely read, and had many strong reviews in many major publications, scholarly and popular, including The NY Times, Washington Post, Population and Environment, Scientific American, Psychlogy Today…you can go on and on. Was it somewhat controversial? Absolutely, but it presented arguments in a balanced way–because I have a respect for genuine dialogue.
I am certain, based on your post, that you have no clue about the breadth of issues researched by the 100 or so scholars associated with the AEI. Many of its scholars, including those writing on complex medical and science issues, are neither left nor right–they are public policy wonks, interested in solutions.
No one at AEI has required me to turn in my Democrat voter registration card, I can assure you.
As for Monday’s conference…it focused only slightly on the IQ issue, but mostly on the issue of why people have such a difficult time discussing the prickly issue of human biodiversity — population genetics. Your post (and interestingly, Dana’s article) proved that point. If you don’t have the background to discuss these incredibly important issues–after all, the Human Genome Project is now focused on finding patterns of DNA that influence behavior and disease–it’s easier to resort to ad hominem attacks.
As for the Jewish IQ debate–one chapter in my book– here are some facts: Ashkenazi Jews have consistently tested out as havign high IQ. IQ is largel genetically based, as 90 percent of psychometricians and and geneticists will tell you. There is a vigorous debate, discussed carefully in Abraham’s Children, about all of the factors, cultural and genetic, leading to variation in IQ.
In fact, there are numerous genetic studies discussing this issue, few by the way, by Jews. Scientists interested in neurological diseaes and DNA repair diseases are extremely interested in this subject for all the right reasons–understanding how the brain functions could leads to medical cures.
So, here’s a challenge: if you are genuinely interested in this issue, instead of trying to show off how sneering you can be, then read the book. If you hate it or think it ill-informed, lay out your case. That’s totally fair. But this posturing in the name of ‘moral superiority’–well, I’ve read your website and it demeans you.
Regards,
Jon Entine
http://www.jonentine.com
http://www.abrahamschildren.net
Daniel Adams on 30 Oct 2007 at 7:38 pm #
Andrew:
I thank that the Tay-Sachs disease mutation linked to increased intelligence may have some veracity. I’ve been arguing for years that gene for sickle cell anemia is probably linked to an increased athletic ability. Also, genes for pasty-white skin and red hair also likely contribute to sexiness. But that’s just my personal experience.
~dpa