TDP redux: US reform, Russian backslide and some neat elections
Sorry we’ve been so quiet. The end of semester looms, and it’s been a week for catching up, especially after last weekend’s Claim Democracy conference. I attended some sessions, reconnected with old colleagues, met a reader and had dinner with one of Election Day’s IRV victors.
Russia meanwhile has refused visas to OSCE election monitors. Not that being able to announce fraud would matter much. The electoral system - from party registration to seat allocation - is basically rigged.
Denmark last week held an election combining list PR with SMD-style nominations.
Slightly dated but no less important, a report out of York University asks why Ontarians rejected MMP last month. The so-called “bads” (evil list tier, bigger legislature) outweighed the goods (especially the citizens’ assembly process). A model predicts MMP would have won with 63% (well above the mandated threshold) had information been more full.
Bob Richard on 17 Nov 2007 at 1:22 pm #
Thanks for the mention of the invaluable York University study — and the link to the Ontario Liberals for Electoral Reform blog where you found it. I hadn’t seen that blog before and I immediately put it on my list of must-visit sites. It appears to have a lot to add to discussions here (and at Fruits and Votes) about Citizens’ Assemblies and about educating the public about electoral reform.