<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Georgia result</title>
	<atom:link href="http://democraticpiece.com/2008/05/28/georgia-result/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://democraticpiece.com/2008/05/28/georgia-result/</link>
	<description>Tentative conclusions on democracy &#38; governance</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MSS</title>
		<link>http://democraticpiece.com/2008/05/28/georgia-result/#comment-3154</link>
		<dc:creator>MSS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 22:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democraticpiece.com/?p=462#comment-3154</guid>
		<description>So, the UNM won 61% of the list votes, yet "frequently has less than a majority" in the nominal-tier districts? Is that counterbalanced by some districts where it is really dominant? Or does it appear that there was a lot of ticket-splitting?

A party winning 60% of the (list) votes but not winning majorities in most districts would be a bit unusual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the UNM won 61% of the list votes, yet &#8220;frequently has less than a majority&#8221; in the nominal-tier districts? Is that counterbalanced by some districts where it is really dominant? Or does it appear that there was a lot of ticket-splitting?</p>
<p>A party winning 60% of the (list) votes but not winning majorities in most districts would be a bit unusual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
