<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1979 Redux?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://democraticpiece.com/2009/06/18/1979-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://democraticpiece.com/2009/06/18/1979-redux/</link>
	<description>Tentative conclusions on democracy &#38; governance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://democraticpiece.com/2009/06/18/1979-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-4311</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democraticpiece.com/?p=1276#comment-4311</guid>
		<description>What do you make of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/18/opinion/18thu2.html?_r=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;current meme&lt;/a&gt; that the Islamic republic has sold out its &quot;republicanism&quot; and exposed itself as a run-of-the-mill military dictatorship?

The strong form of this argument is that the regime&#039;s electoralism has lost its legitimacy, and this is a rallying point for mass mobilization against Islamic-republican institutions writ large. Taken with remarks by opposition leaders like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adn.es/politica/20090613/NWS-1055-EEUU-UE-Resistencia-Lider-comicios.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt; - &quot;An election in a theocratic regime is bogus. It&#039;s a selection, not an election.&quot; - is there any predictive value to the argument?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you make of the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/18/opinion/18thu2.html?_r=1" rel="nofollow">current meme</a> that the Islamic republic has sold out its &#8220;republicanism&#8221; and exposed itself as a run-of-the-mill military dictatorship?</p>
<p>The strong form of this argument is that the regime&#8217;s electoralism has lost its legitimacy, and this is a rallying point for mass mobilization against Islamic-republican institutions writ large. Taken with remarks by opposition leaders like <a href="http://www.adn.es/politica/20090613/NWS-1055-EEUU-UE-Resistencia-Lider-comicios.html" rel="nofollow">these</a> &#8211; &#8220;An election in a theocratic regime is bogus. It&#8217;s a selection, not an election.&#8221; &#8211; is there any predictive value to the argument?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
