<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Democratic Piece &#187; Malta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://democraticpiece.com/tag/malta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://democraticpiece.com</link>
	<description>Tentative conclusions on democracy &#38; governance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 03:23:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Malta tinkers with STV</title>
		<link>http://democraticpiece.com/2007/10/02/malta-tinkers-with-stv/</link>
		<comments>http://democraticpiece.com/2007/10/02/malta-tinkers-with-stv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democraticpiece.com/2007/10/02/malta-tinkers-with-stv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This would have been a more detailed discussion, but the better Times of Malta piece is inaccessible due to site maintenance. In any event, Malta has used the single transferable vote in 5-seat districts for elections to its House of Representatives since the 1920s. Apparently since 1987, it has tinkered with the specifics of seat [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would have been a more detailed discussion, but the better <a href="http://www.timesofmalta.com/core/article.php?id=276010"><i>Times of Malta</i> piece</a> is inaccessible due to site maintenance.</p>
<p>In any event, Malta has used the single transferable vote in 5-seat districts for elections to its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Representatives_of_Malta">House of Representatives</a> since the 1920s. Apparently since 1987, it has tinkered with the specifics of seat allocation. <a href="http://www.maltamedia.com/artman2/publish/govt_politics/article_3576.shtml">Recent developments</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Maltese Parliament on Wednesday night approved changes in the Maltese Constitution that cater for significant changes in general elections. Gozo will remain a single unified electoral district while strict proportionality between the number of first preferences and the number of seats obtained will be guaranteed when two parties are elected.</p></blockquote>
<p>STV seeks to guarantee proportionality of seat shares to support for factions through surplus transfers and eliminations, that is, by minimizing wasted votes. Each seat in the district corresponds to a quota of votes. Votes in excess of the quota are transferred to voters&#8217; next-preferred candidates. There are different ways of determining the quota, two being the Hare and Droop methods.</p>
<p>Without knowledge of context or, perhaps, some deeper understanding of micro-dynamics, it&#8217;s hard to tell what change would effect &#8220;strict proportionality.&#8221; Thoughts?</p>
<p>I hope the other site comes back online soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://democraticpiece.com/2007/10/02/malta-tinkers-with-stv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
